Sovereign immunity, a legal doctrine that shields governments from being sued without their consent, has faced increasing scrutiny in recent years. Critics argue that its continued application often hampers accountability and justice, especially in cases involving negligence, discrimination, and human rights violations. As society progresses and legal frameworks evolve, the need for governments to be held accountable for their actions has become paramount.
Recent legislative changes have emerged, aimed at limiting the scope of sovereign immunity. Courts are increasingly allowing exceptions, particularly in cases where public entities cause harm or violate rights. The rise of civil society and advocacy groups has further pressured governments to acknowledge their responsibilities toward citizens.
As public sentiment shifts, it is clear that the traditional notion of sovereign immunity may be seen as outdated. The expiration of its broad application signifies a move towards greater transparency and justice, reinforcing the principle that governments, like individuals, should be answerable for their actions.
For more details and the full reference, visit the source link below: